San Francisco End the Fed 4/25/09: Can We Talk FOMC?
As I pointed out this morning before I headed out to my second End the Fed rally planned for 10a at the Embarcadero in SF, I would like the record to reflect that I don't necessarily want to end the Fed. I do and feel that we'd all be much better off but as yet no one has offered a viable alternative (social credit? gold coin? Ok, how do you propose we do that?) and dismantling the beast we call the Fed would cause uncontrollable chaos if nothing were set up to replace it or at least ease the transition.
At the end of our little rally, some 3 hours after it began, I popped a squat on a Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco planter, my "The Joke is on You, America!" sign carefully balanced between my thighs (hot, right? Sound money is always hot!), calling "No more bailouts!" and "End the Fed!" to passing cars.
Oddly enough, I was fortunate enough to spend a few moments talking with a member of a progressive liberal group who agreed wholeheartedly with my argument. We discussed the education of this strange group of 18 - 34 year olds (along with a few OGs, of course) who follow Ron Paul and are happy to send out the sound money warning call. "My problem with all of this," I said, gesturing with my "End Forever Debt" sign towards the protesters gathered to our left, "is that if you are going to go after something as large as the Federal Reserve, you need to know who you're fighting. Few in this group understand open market operations, interest rates, the functions of the 12 regional banks. What if you told them their paychecks wouldn't get processed if we ended the Fed tomorrow? They'd walk away."
She echoed my sentiment and we would have spent more time talking except Dprogram.net's webmaster appeared talking about 9-11 Truth and Alex Jones. I suggested (politely, of course) that if he wanted to give his pitch more legitimacy, he might consider keeping Jones' name out of it.

Midway through the rally, a fellow protester who looked like he might have had a Ron Paul action figure under his bed was talking about the bipartisanship of this movement, or rather how some participants have turned it into a left/right issue.
Turning to him I asked "Are you leftist or rightist?"
"Extreme leftist," he said, grinning. There went my Ron Paul action figure theory, but I suppose with my skunk-streaked hair and tattoos, I don't look all that much like a conservative either. Good thing the libertarians have a reputation I guess.
I thrust out my hand and grinned back, "I'm a conservative and the DHS considers me a right-wing extremist, nice to see we can agree on this one thing! I watch Fox News all the time!" I was kidding on that last part. Thankfully they got the joke.
Win one for bipartisanship.
And as my new progressive liberal "friend" said, the problem with "End the Fed" is that it is an extreme answer to a very real problem. She's absolutely right. Knowing that does not mean I'd rather stay at home (since no one is going to have a "Reform the Federal Reserve!" rally in this town) but it certainly makes my objective all that much clearer. But we knew that already, didn't we, kids?
We discussed having me do a guest speech for her group's upcoming lecture series on the money problem and how so many are still so entirely in the dark. Sadly, even those who consider themselves "enlightened" to the Fed problem also seem to be in the dark to some extent.
In other End the Fed awesomeness, each time the call went out "Federal Reserve, who do they serve?" I was happy to call back "Goldman Sachs!"
"Federal Reserve, who do they serve?" "JP Morgan!"
"Federal Reserve, who do they serve?" "Citigroup!"
You get the point. My voice is nearly gone from all the "NO MORE BAILOUTS!" screaming at tourists wandering through Union Square. But they paid attention and that's the important part. Even if we bopped just one of the sheeple on the head to say "Hey, did you know that the Fed is neither Federal nor has any reserves?" and they went home to consider the gravity of this, our job is done. For today at least.
We handed out information, flyers, recruited folks to join the march along the way, and at the end of the day, it was a low-drama event. No media coverage. No paparazzi. No SFPD in riot gear spraying us down with pepper spray. Just random giggles from passersby at some hilarious signs (and a certain Bernanke ZIRP t-shirt) and a lot of questions. What do you mean the Fed isn't federal? should not be a question most Americans ask - sadly, that's what we get all the time.
"Federal Reserve, who do they serve?" "Bank of America!" Well... not anymore since Paulson threw Bernanke under the bus and Ken Lewis snitched them both out. Again, a perfect example of the movement is that few even knew about Bernaulson's alleged securities fraud in the BofA/Merrill deal. Hello! Aren't we paying attention here? Someone? Anyone? Am I on crack and making all of this stuff up? As much as it feels that way sometimes seeing as how I'm reporting on the Bizarro happenings day in and day out, each Fed and Treasury move stranger than the last, sadly, this is all too real.
Even though I am on team "Reform the Fed," I'll certainly be at the next one. And the next one. And the next one. Until at last sane money is restored in America and everyone lives happily ever after. Or something close. I'll settle for anything better than what we've got now and mostly just want the Fed to lay its cards on the table and be honest about what it is and what it is doing. Keep dreaming, right? Yeah, well, I don't plan on stopping any time soon.
All in all, it was nice to see different viewpoints converge on this one issue - and as my new progressive friend so astutely pointed out, you've got to remove the politics if you're going to get anywhere. She's right. But "End the Fed" isn't my movement. I've got my own little version of "revolution" to worry about.
Our unifying thread? HR 1207 to audit the Fed. You know me, I'm all about an audit! Woo! Break open the books and let's see what the Creature from Jekyll Island has been up to... Yay!
Renewed by our event, I suppose now it's time to get back to poking at Goldman Sachs and what those diabolical pricks have been up to. Thanks, San Francisco, for a satisfying day in the sun against the Fed. Yes, the patron saint of protesters smiled upon us with a warm SF day - thank God. The Bernanke 00% shirt just isn't funny if it's covered up by a hoodie.
Ron Paul on speaking recently with a former member of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors confirms that the Fed understands that they are destroying the US Dollar. They know exactly what they are doing which makes their actions not just irresponsible but criminal. Treasonous. Blatantly deceptive. Among any other number of sins.
RP: You know, interestingly, just recently, I cannot name his name but I was talking to a former member of the Federal Reserve board and told him about the bill [HR 1207] and he was friendly enough.
I said, “What do you think of that?” He said, “I think it’s not a very good idea”. And I said, “Do the people at the Federal Reserve ever talk about, are concerned about the dollar”. I said, you know, I’m always talking about the dollar and what this is going to do to the dollar. And I said, “Do they know that all this debt and inflation could hurt the dollar?” He says, “Yes, they do.” He confirmed it. He said, “They absolutely do.” He says, “But they can’t answer your questions in public because it would cause panic.”
Mmm hmm.
If the Fed is playing above the table, they don't need to fear HR 1207. But we know better than that, don't we?
Pics of the event may be found via Twitpic and Flickr.







9 comments:
Great post! I wish I could have been there.
Ron Paul actually mentioned this. It's not that getting rid of the fed would be so difficult, as much as going over to the gold standard. It would take years to implement and Ron Paul said you'd have a period where Gold was allowed to compete with the dollar. Gold of course winning out. As far as ending the fed and the repercussions of that? What did we do before the fed was created in 1913? A true free market does not need a federal reserve. However if you want to manipulate, price fix, inflate and intervene in the economy then yeah you need a fed. Jr Deputy do you follow Austrian economics at all? Thanks, I love your blog. Very funny and informative.
Anonymous:
You've made my point. The Republic survived without a Fed from 1792-1913. We can survive without one again. But the Fed does ... So? Whatever the Fed does that is worthwhile, will be offered on the market. Banks had a clearing house before the Fed; if the Fed disappears they will recreate it.
Are you alluding to Hayek's work in about 1976 on "free choice in currencies"? Repeal of the legal tender laws and the death of the Fed would lead to a reverse Gresham's Law as the US dollar is replaced by gold.
"Pop"
Great post, I'm still trying to get past the sexy image with the protest sign... It's a very good point. What is equally important for America, is all those petro dollars in countries around the globe that would effectively become worthless, or the Navy vessels and US troops stationed in 155 countries of this world which at that point could not afford to pay for fuel. I worry a little bit more about those things than inflation pushing up the price of my salt free chips at Walmart.
Ending the Fed overnight would be a disaster of biblical proportions. However, all change begins somewhere and a downtown rally is just as good a spot as any to start.
In the US now there are 6 states with pending honest money legislation. Those are bills that allows the individual states to accept gold and silver minted US coins at their market value (Price of metal not face value) for certain taxes and fees. It's a very small amount of revenue which is intended to start the ball rolling back to honest money. All of the Bills also allow the use of digital gold currency in place of actual gold and described in detail the way to accomplish this task. There is a ton of info on these bills and they are all pretty much patterned after www.goldmoneybill.orgUsage is voluntary if citizens want to use it and requires the state to accept it. Also smaller streams of revenue like Tobacco tax is required to be collected in gold, silver or digital metal.
I did an issue on the 6 States DGC MagazineDigital gold currency and honest money are the solution,(I would contend a better solution than Shariah Finance) but it has to start very slowly so people can understand it and that could be on the state level.
So keep up the rallies, let's pass some smaller state bills and begin the journey back to honest money. Then when it's eventually time, dump the evil Federal Reserve or as I call it the "house of pain"
Mark
WC,
Welcome back from Digital Detox. Can't wait to hear how it went. I tried but failed miserably after the first day.
Anon,
I do follow Austrian economics - if you read me when I'm not ragging on the banks you'll see that many of my suggestions and thoughts are along those lines.
Pop,
I think as much as we can expose it, as Mark said, it will end up shrinking away. "Ending" the Fed is not an appropriate goal - it is just impossible. However, if we make it a goal to expose the Fed as much as possible, it will accomplish "ending" it as once you pull back the obscure layers you see how truly corrupt they are.
Gold will win in the end if we are able to expose the Fed. And if not? Maybe another 100 years of slavery then. Good times.
Jr
I used to think the end of the world would be some attack by aliens and/or global war. But now I believe it will simply be fiat currencies failing globally. It'd be awesome if the United States could become libertarian enough to move toward a commodities based currency. What? A man can dream.
Robert,
Zombie apocalypse first. Then sound money.
We'll get there.
Jr
Obviously the Fed is not doing their job; things are already going to hell in a hand basket.
Ending the Fed abruptly may even make things a bit worse, I do not really know, however as the free market kicks in things will be corrected and get better.
Leaving the Fed alone certainly means things will get worse as they cause the dollar to collapse by continuous printing.
As to who will take over probably the department of treasury.
Andrew Jackson ended a central bank and paid the countries debt off during his time. We could pattern its removal after how it was done in the past making modifications as needed to match our current issues and needs.
As to creation of money then we simply look back to JFK who signed or even Lincoln and his Green Backs. This is not a problem imop.
We do not need the Fed and we would be better off in the end without it. Especially if you consider how inflation has been robbing the people for nearly 100 years.
**JFK signed Executive Order 11110
Post a Comment
Post a Comment