The Awesome, Awe-inspiring Power of Government Accounting

Wednesday, June 16, 2010 , , , 1 Comments



I have a request for Congress, Obama, Tim Geithner, Sheila Bair and any other government asshat who comes within 500 feet of a government financial statement: mandatory classes in government accounting. No one is asking for these guys to learn variance analysis and we would never imply that they go so far as to learn how to make a balance sheet balance (I'll find a rainbow unicorn chained outside of my apartment before that happens) but I think a remedial lesson in the particulars of government accounting would be really useful to guys like Henry Waxman and anyone else bold enough to question accounting practices they do not and will never understand.

Those in glass houses...

Anyway, I found this via Financial Armageddon.

Kevin Williamson via the National Review:

Accountants get a bad rap — boring, green-eyeshades-wearing, nebbishy little men chained to their desks down in the fluorescent-lit basements of Corporate America — but, in truth, accountants wield an awesome power. In the case of the federal government, they wield the power to make vast amounts of debt disappear — from the public discourse, at least. A couple of months ago, you may recall, Rep. Henry Waxman (D., State of Bankruptcy) got his Fruit of the Looms in a full-on buntline hitch when AT&T, Caterpillar, Verizon, and a host of other blue-chip behemoths started taking plus-size writedowns in response to some of the more punitive provisions of the health-care legislation Mr. Waxman had helped to pass. His little mustache no doubt bristling in indignation, Representative Waxman sent dunning letters to the CEOs of these companies and demanded that they come before Congress to explain their accounting practices. One White House staffer told reporters that the writedowns appeared to be designed “to embarrass the president and Democrats.”

A few discreet whispers from better-informed Democrats, along with a helpful explanation from The Atlantic’s Megan McArdle under the headline “Henry Waxman’s War on Accounting,” helped to clarify the issue: The companies in question are required by law to adjust their financial statements to reflect the new liabilities: “When a company experiences what accountants call ‘a material adverse impact’ on its expected future earnings, and those changes affect an item that is already on the balance sheet, the company is required to record the negative impact — ‘to take the charge against earnings’ — as soon as it knows that the change is reasonably likely to occur,” McArdle wrote. “The Democrats, however, seem to believe that Generally Accepted Accounting Principles are some sort of conspiracy against Obamacare, and all that is good and right in America.” But don’t be too hard on the gentleman from California: Government does not work that way. If governments did follow normal accounting practices, taking account of future liabilities today instead of pretending they don’t exist, then the national-debt numbers we talk about would be worse — far worse, dreadfully worse — than that monster $14 trillion–and–ratcheting–upward figure we throw around.

The diligent green eyeshade wearing bastards in charge of handling the government's finances have it pretty sweet. They don't have to make balance sheets balance and if we as a government were publicly traded, they'd still get to keep Fannie and Freddie buried somewhere in the footnotes. It's a pretty sweet gig, just make sure all the money is gone at the end of the year (uhh).

The government is lucky we don't use GAAP for our own finances or we'd be insolvent, fraudulent and likely to garner a going concern doubt as to our ability to remain in business. Just sayin.

Jr Deputy Accountant

Some say he’s half man half fish, others say he’s more of a seventy/thirty split. Either way he’s a fishy bastard.

1 comments:

elf2006real said...

Well when you can print your own money, you're never poor, right?

Would it be illegal for the executive branch to institute GAAP by executive order of the President?

I don't know the answer, but if a President did, he'd be able to garner the political capital to begin to get us out of the hole.