Senators Want More on the Face (Of Financial Statements, That Is)
Wait one second here, are you saying that we have too many footnotes and not enough relevant information on the face? Slap me twice and call me Bernanke, are you serious?!
I imagine FASB has nothing to add to this conversation unless the IASB allows them to issue guidance on disclosures for the 14,000th time and hopefully that will fix everything right up. Surely.
Six Democratic Senators have asked the head of the Securities and Exchange Commission to require more disclosure about the trillions of dollars worth of debts and financial assets U.S. companies keep off of their balance sheets.
Led by Senate Banking Committee member Robert Menendez, the Senators said in an August 6 letter to SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro that they want U.S. companies to provide better disclosure about their off balance sheet activities -- ranging from investments, to financings, to leases.
The letter is as follows and I don't apologize if you find it TLDR.
August 6, 2010
The Honorable Mary L. Schapiro
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, NW
Washington, DC 20549
Dear Chairwoman Schapiro:
The financial crisis has taught us a great deal, and we are very pleased that the Dodd-Frank Wall Street reform bill incorporates much of this new wisdom. It will go a long way toward reducing the frequency and severity of future financial crises.
As you set out to implement this new law, we write to address one area that we believe needs particular attention: how completely and accurately companies disclose their financial information. Without such disclosure, it is almost impossible for regulators to set appropriate capital and leverage requirements and for investors and counterparties to make wise decisions about where to put their money.
This, unfortunately, is a lesson that we should have learned from Enron and the corporate accounting scandals that led to the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Enron reportedly maintained 3,500 off-balance sheet partnerships on which the company built an elaborate fiction of earnings statements. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act gave the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) the power to require reporting of off-balance sheet activities.
While the SEC did issue rules on off-balance sheet activity pursuant to Sarbanes-Oxley, we are troubled that despite these rules, widespread off-balance sheet accounting arrangements allowed large financial firms to hide trillions of dollars in obligations from investors, creditors, and regulators. As Frank Partnoy and Lynn E. Turner wrote in a recent report, “Abusive off-balance sheet accounting was a major cause of the financial crisis. These abuses triggered a daisy chain of dysfunctional decision-making by removing transparency from investors, markets, and regulators. Off-balance sheet accounting facilitated the spread of the bad loans, securitizations, and derivative transactions that brought the financial system to the brink of collapse.”
For example, Citigroup reportedly kept $1.1 trillion worth of assets off its books in various financing vehicles and trusts that were used to handle mortgage-backed securities and issue short-term debt. State Street shareholders saw their investment value drop by 60% in a single day when hidden off-balance sheet conduits sustained heavy losses under credit turmoil in January 2009. Neither of these companies adequately disclosed the risks posed by their off-balance sheet activities to investors. Had they done so, investors and creditors might have made better decisions.
For these reasons, we urge the SEC to use its existing authority under Sarbanes-Oxley to require that companies write detailed descriptions of all their off-balance sheet activities in their annual 10K reports (not just those that are “reasonably likely” to affect the firm’s financial condition, as the regulations currently state). Companies should also explicitly justify why they have not brought those liabilities onto the balance sheet. Complete disclosure of all off-balance sheet activities is particularly crucial for the largest and most interconnected companies, including both banks and non-banks. Additionally, we also urge the SEC to encourage the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) to improve financial reporting rules for all types of off-balance sheet activities and to monitor FASB’s efforts to prohibit off-balance sheet financing.
We urge the SEC to pay particular attention to the large market for repurchase agreements. We are concerned by both the risks of using short-term funding for longer-term holdings and that firms may be engaging in these transactions with the intent to hide their true debt and risk levels. For example, the Lehman Brothers use of the “Repo 105” transaction is particularly troubling. According to the Lehman Brothers Examiner’s Report conducted by Anton Valukas, Lehman took advantage of accounting rules to temporarily book a loan as a sale, and by carefully timing this transaction just before the release of its quarterly financial report, Lehman was able to deceive the public and regulators into thinking it was much better capitalized than it actually was.
Moreover, this may not be limited to Lehman. According to the Wall Street Journal, “A group of 18 banks—which includes Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Morgan Stanley, J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., Bank of America Corp., and Citigroup Inc.—understated the debt levels used to fund securities trades by lowering them an average of 42% at the end of each of the past five quarterly periods, the data show. The banks, which publicly release debt data each quarter, then boosted the debt levels in the middle of successive quarters.”
Those who engaged in fraud in the past must be held accountable under our existing securities fraud statutes. But we must also look forward. In order to prevent this from happening in the future, we urge the SEC to require disclosure of period end and daily average leverage ratios in quarterly and annual reports. This would provide useful information to investors and creditors to assist their decision-making processes. Rather than relying on carefully-staged quarterly and annual snapshots, investors and creditors should have access to a complete real-life picture of a company’s financial situation.
The SEC was founded on the premise that when investors and creditors have full and accurate information about companies’ finances, they can allocate capital effectively. But when companies use accounting gimmicks to mislead investors and creditors, capital markets malfunction. As we attempt to recover from the latest meltdown, we hope that, in addition to aggressively investigating and prosecuting past misconduct, you will put in place these new rules that will make it harder for companies to mislead investors and creditors in the future.
UNITED STATES SENATORS
You know how I always say good luck with that and rarely ever mean it? This would be one of those times. While the effort is undoubtedly well-intentioned, I'm pretty sure Mary Schapiro is already more than aware that financial statements are chock full of all kinds of hidden goodies and perhaps even in on the scam to keep things that way. The good Senators do realize that banks would have to come up with the appropriate level of capital to offset the $200+ trillion in off-sheet crap they've got going on, right? There isn't even that much money in the world for Christ's sake. Who cares, it's all notional, it's not like it could actually destroy the global economy right? Good luck with that!